What the bytes were
A cryptographic fingerprint of the exact uploaded bytes identifies each artifact. Change a single byte and the artifact no longer matches its registered fingerprint.
Register high-value digital assets, govern changes, preserve version lineage and verify the cryptographic evidence behind every committed version — for source code, CAD designs, AI models and technical documentation.
When designs, algorithms, research records and technical documents change hands, organizations need more than a file date or an audit-log entry. They need verifiable evidence of what was registered, which version was approved and what can be independently checked later.
Imagine an algorithm developed in 2026. In 2031 an investor, acquirer, auditor or legal expert asks about one historical version. The original team may have moved on, the repository may have been migrated and the original infrastructure may no longer run. The evidence has to stand on its own.
Four steps turn a valuable artifact into a verifiable history — built on the same durable execution and proof foundation that runs every Nitrotick workflow.
A cryptographic fingerprint of the exact uploaded bytes identifies each artifact. Change a single byte and the artifact no longer matches its registered fingerprint.
Each version commits its approved attributes and related document digests, and links to the version before it. Verification can recompute that commitment from the retained inputs and compare it with the original.
Every capability is labelled with its current status, so you know exactly what is available today and what is on the roadmap.
Every committed version receives a signed Nitrotick Proof that binds its content digests, approved attributes and state commitment.
Each new version points to exactly one predecessor, forming a linear, gap-free history. A forged parent link fails verification.
Nothing becomes evidence until an authorized reviewer approves it. Reviewer, approver and uploader are recorded as distinct roles.
Recompute the committed state of an earlier version and compare it with the recorded commitment — instead of trusting a database administrator.
Pluggable storage backends and governed retention policies, so artifacts can stay in infrastructure you control under your retention rules.
A versioned evidence bundle and a separately deployable verifier that checks proofs offline — without access to the original Nitrotick runtime.
Optional eIDAS qualified timestamping (QeTS) of finalized proofs, validated against the EU Trusted Lists and reported separately from the proof itself.
n-of-m approval for designated high-value transitions, enforced by backend policy and recorded in the evidence.
An additional public commitment of batched proofs for organizations that want one. Never a prerequisite for a Nitrotick Proof.
Every artifact is a byte stream plus approved metadata, so one evidence model covers source code, CAD, AI models and documents alike.
Research artifacts, experimental results and technical specifications with a provable record of how each one evolved.
Design baselines, drawings and engineering changes, approved by the right principals at each revision.
A structured evidence history of proprietary releases, from source-code archives to protocol specifications.
Model weights, training configurations and algorithm implementations tied to the version that was actually approved.
Controlled document versions, invention disclosures and approval histories that stay verifiable after migrations.
Hand a design to a customer or partner with evidence of exactly which bytes and which approved version were delivered.
Before asking enterprises to trust this model, we are applying it to our own most valuable asset: the Nitrotick source code, its release history and its architectural decisions.
That discipline keeps the product honest. It forces the hard questions: what happens if a historical artifact is missing? Can a verifier detect an inconsistent commitment? Can a previous version be reconstructed without relying on the current application database?
The self-registration of Nitrotick's own releases is our first internal acceptance case. We will publish the full technical case study once the end-to-end procedure, including independent verification, is complete.
Intellectual property deserves more than storage. It deserves evidence that can withstand independent examination. — Aleksandar M. Tasevski, Founder & Principal Architect
Nitrotick verifies evidence of registered data and recorded decisions. It does not itself determine legal ownership, authorship, patentability or legal admissibility.
| Evidence | What it establishes | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Content digest | The supplied bytes match the registered artifact | Who created the artifact |
| Version lineage | Which approved version preceded which | That no other copies exist elsewhere |
| Approval record | Which identity approved the change, under which policy | Legal title or inventorship |
| Nitrotick Proof | The committed state has not been altered since it was proven | An external, qualified time attestation (planned add-on) |
| State reconstruction | The retained evidence is consistent with the original commitment | The original file, if it was lawfully deleted under your retention policy |
Ownership and authorship claims are recorded as claims, together with the claimant and the basis of the claim. Legal ownership depends on contracts, employment arrangements, assignments and applicable IP law.
IP Evidence & Verification is an enterprise B2B product, licensed annually and deployed where your contract requires.
Private cloudOn-premiseSaaS
Encryption, key custody and storage responsibilities are agreed per deployment before any confidential artifact is accepted.
No. Nitrotick creates and verifies technical evidence about what was registered, which version was approved and how it evolved. It does not register IP rights, and it does not determine ownership, authorship, patentability or legal admissibility.
That depends on the contracted deployment. Client-owned storage is a supported design target: your artifacts can stay in your own storage while Nitrotick records their content digests, approved metadata and proofs. The exact custody model is defined in your contract.
A portable evidence bundle and a separately deployable, offline-capable verifier are on the product roadmap. Until they pass their acceptance tests, verification and reconstruction run in the Nitrotick platform.
No. Nitrotick Proofs do not depend on a blockchain. Public-chain anchoring is an optional, planned extension for organizations that want an additional public commitment.
No. AI-assisted metadata extraction is optional and never authoritative. Only attributes approved by an authorized person under your enterprise policy are committed to the evidence.
Qualified electronic timestamping (eIDAS QeTS) is a planned, optional integration. It will be offered only after the provider integration and its validation are complete, and every proof will clearly state whether an external timestamp is present.
Start with one asset and three versions. Message the founder on LinkedIn with your industry, asset types and deployment requirements — please do not send confidential IP in the first message.